H6 Discharge to follow-up
BTS post-COVID follow-up guidance
- Patient
- b303f530 · 40-59 · F
- Organisation
- 6be05ccf
- Documents
- 5 · evidence in discharge summary, clinic letter
- Target
- 336 h
Verdict computed from the quoted times
abstain abstained (end event exists)
- Documented
- —
- Target
- 336 h
- Model said
- not breached · not used
Next step from the protocol, not the model
- Owner
- Respiratory clinic coordinator
- Action
- Locate the missing record — nothing is imputed
Evidence verbatim quotes, located on the page
-
from time · discharge summary, page 1
Discharge date: 27/03/2020
show on page -
to time · clinic letter, page 1
she was eventually seen in follow-up clinic at 13:17 on 29/04/2020
show on page -
reason · clinic letter, page 1
Patient could not be contacted after discharge; letters returned to the address was incorrect.
show on page -
reason · clinic letter, page 1
Following updated contact details obtained via the GP practice, she was eventually seen in follow-up clinic at 13:17 on 29/04/2020.
show on page
Your review
Review history
no reviews yet
Details — timing, why this row, the model's reading
| discharged (documented) | not documented |
|---|---|
| follow up (documented) | 2020-04-29 13:17:00 |
| measured (from quoted times) | — / target 336 h |
| standard | BTS post-COVID follow-up guidance |
Why this row
- model and computed status disagree
- abstained despite end event
flags: model call ≠ computed status; abstained though end event exists
Model's reading model call ≠ computed status (model said not breached)
Discharged 27/03/2020, seen in follow-up 13:17 on 29/04/2020: 33.75 hours, which is not greater than the 336-hour target, so not_breached; the clinic letter gives a cause.
confidence 0.90
The model only points at the text; hours and status are computed from the quoted times. Owner and action come from the protocol, not the model.