H6 Discharge to follow-up
BTS post-COVID follow-up guidance
- Patient
- 42ac27b7 · 18-39 · M
- Organisation
- 23834663
- Documents
- 5 · evidence in discharge summary, clinic letter
- Target
- 336 h
Verdict computed from the quoted times
abstain abstained (end event exists)
- Documented
- —
- Target
- 336 h
- Model said
- breached · not used
Next step from the protocol, not the model
- Owner
- Respiratory clinic coordinator
- Action
- Locate the missing record — nothing is imputed
Evidence verbatim quotes, located on the page
-
from time · discharge summary, page 1
Discharge date/time: 17:53, 23/03/2020
show on page -
to time · clinic letter, page 1
Patient seen in follow-up clinic 06:34 on 29/04/2020
show on page -
reason · clinic letter, page 1
Patient could not be contacted after discharge; letters returned as the address was incorrect.
show on page -
reason · clinic letter, page 1
The patient did not attend the initially arranged respiratory follow-up appointment and was eventually contacted via an updated mobile number provided by the GP surgery, resulting in the later review date above.
show on page
Your review
Review history
no reviews yet
Details — timing, why this row, the model's reading
| discharged (documented) | not documented |
|---|---|
| follow up (documented) | 2020-04-29 06:34:00 |
| measured (from quoted times) | — / target 336 h |
| standard | BTS post-COVID follow-up guidance |
Why this row
- model and computed status disagree
- abstained despite end event
flags: model call ≠ computed status; abstained though end event exists
Model's reading model call ≠ computed status (model said breached)
Discharged 17:53 on 23/03/2020, seen in follow-up 06:34 on 29/04/2020: 37.75 days (898 hours), which is greater than the 336-hour target, so breached; the clinic letter gives a cause.
confidence 0.90
The model only points at the text; hours and status are computed from the quoted times. Owner and action come from the protocol, not the model.